“‘DSS is civil, not interested in arresting anyone on the shade …

The lawyer Senior made the declaration on Wednesday shortly after submitting a new application before the Federal Court in Abuja for an interlocutory injunction that prevents Utomi from commenting further publicly or committing himself in events in relation to the topic of a cause waiting for him against him on his plan announced to establish a shadow government in the country.

Kehinde, who spoke with journalists, said: “Our client is not interested in arresting anyone in the matter, having his own correct himself has undergone the jurisdiction of the honorable court to interpret the constitution and determine the legality or not of the” shadow government “or any other nomenclature that can be thus named.

“It should be emphasized that our client, under his current leadership, is a very civil organization with absolute confidence in the rule of law and this is why his leadership or any of his staff will always approach the court of each time he feels that there is no infringement for his legal tasks for anyone straight that the court is in danger from anyone who has to do.

“Gentlemen, we must all guarantee that constitutional democracy and the rule of law are combined with Nigeria.

“It is positive that as members of the fourth seal of the Kingdom, they date back to the case presented against the formation of” Shadow Government “by Prof. Pat Utomi and his group.

“The civil case, as you are aware, was presented by the state security service (SSS) in consonance with its legal mandate to guarantee internal peace and avoidance of any form of insurrection and traditionable crime against the democratically elected government in the country.

“We, as consultants for the SSS, have just submitted a application in search of an interlocutory injunction against the accused and his group pending the determination of the substantial cause.

“The question being a public document can be obtained from the register of honorable court.

He continued: “The question is based on the fact that, despite the slope of the substantial action, the service of the same on the accused and the entry of the apparition to the same by his lawyer, Mike Ozekhome, San, the defendant continued to make inflammatory declarations capable of accusing chaos in the country instead of blocking the Hollowed principle that the Court was expected to maintain the declaration to support the substances of the substances.

“What our client has presented to the Court is for the interpretation of the Constitution if any form of government by any nomenclature can be formed or allowed outside the Constitution,” said Kehinde.

The New Application Seeks Mainly, “An Order of Interlocution Injunction, Resttraining The Defenseant/Respondent (Utomi), His Agents, Privies, Associates, Servants, Worldrs or Any Person Ay Newspaper Publications, Television Programs, Jingles or Any Other Public Enlightenment Program (S) Aimed at Sensitizing, Instigating, propagating or in any way promoting the alleged “shadow/shadow government” or its objectives or objectives with the opinion of establishing the said “shadow government” pending the hearing and determination of this substantial cause.

The reason for the application includes that, if not detained, the proposed Roliies, shows and actions of Utomi “constitute a serious threat to public order, the safety and the national unity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.

The SSS added that, since the Agency has statedly authorized to safeguard the country’s internal security and prevent any threat to the legal authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and its constituent institutions, any threat to public order, safety and national unity behaved on it.

He said that before having filed the substantial cause, marked: FHC/Abj/CS/937/2025 Utomi had, through public declarations, social media and other platforms engaged in declarations and actions aimed at undermining the result of the case now awaiting the Court and of which he is aware.

The SSS declared that it has gathered through the monitoring and intelligence relationships that Utomi, which is currently outside the country and should return the plans of June 6 “to organize shows and rally under the sowing of freedom of speech and association in an attempt to cause public discontent following its establishment of the alleged” shadow government “.

The actor added, in a sworn declaration in support, that Utomi’s intention “is to organize on road shows and events capable of drawing a large number of Nigerians with intent that will cause a huge interruption of peace, the rupture of public order, enable disorders and violent protests just like the recent protests of the” end Sars “in 2020.

“All the protests provided, the disorders and agitations that derive from it, if the alleged actions of the defendant/respondent have not remained, they can lead to chaos with an anarchy potential, launch of lives and properties.

“The proposed allies, the shows and actions of the defendant/respondent constitute a serious threat to public order, safety and national unity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

The SSS said that on May 26 during the fourth edition of the Topaz lessons, the themed “Ombra Government: a distraction or necessity”, hosted by the mass communication class of the University of Lagos (Unilag) of the Alumni Association of 1988, Utomi has made statements, capable of undermining the pending cause.

He added that the declarations, widely advertised by various national newspapers and on social media platforms, Utomi has defended the creation of the alleged shadow government and have also stated that if the cause is successful in favor of the ASS, he himself and his group will adopt a different name.

The SSS added that Utomi “was served with the process of origin in this cause and has appeared apparently saw his consultant Prof. Mike Ozekhome (San) from 20 May 2025.

“The accused/respondent (Utomi) is aware of the slope of this action before this honorable court since it was served with the process of origin in this cause by the courier, as ordered by this honorable court.

“Unless this honorable Court intervene by granting this question, the documents of the defendant/respondent can obtain a false realization in court.

“It is in the interest of justice, national security and the rule of law for this honorable Court to grant this question,” said SSS.

Related