An eruption of interference in the internal affairs of the administrative wing of the National Assembly by legislators is eroding productivity and efficiency in the bureaucracy of the National Assembly.
The conclave reports that the reduction/publication of staff members, a purely administrative process in bureaucracy to strengthen productivity and efficiency in the provision of services, is now very well overturned by the political wing of the national assembly.
The legislators, as learned, have rejected the weight of their political influence in inverting the deployment, publication or reduction of staff members or directly connected to them or those staff members who reach them for assistance to reverse the management decision.
The conclave reports that this development is able to destroy the discipline in the service and the all -round service, which is the fundamental essence of bureaucracy.
Through distribution and reduction, staff members are brought through all the game exemplified by the various departments/directors of the service of the National Assembly to allow them the ability to build and institutional memory.
But choosing and choosing where to be longer than necessary, with the help of the influence of legislators, the essence of all -round exposure to the overall mechanisms of Nass’s bureaucracy is widely made impossible, thus upsetting the essence of [civil] service.
This is how the scenario that has become a contagion between staff members: a staff member who does not want to leave his duty for another simply implements the influence of a legislator to convince the direction to reverse his decision.
Unfortunately, the interference of these legislators in the functioning of the civil service is alienating and demoralizing other staff members who can’t wait to redistribute as an opportunity to serve and allow them to enjoy the benefits of these decisions and administrative processes.
The concern in the Nass service is right now that the involvement of legislators in the functioning of the civil service is creating animosity and demotivating the members of laborious staff.
Development is also the breeding of mediocrity and public officials in the middle of Nass’s bureaucracy.
The members of the informed staff whose movements had been affected by their colleagues through the avenge of influence, are of the opinion that the legislators should desist from interference with the functioning of the civil service.
One of them who is obviously angry said: “They [lawmakers] I’m not business there [NASS i ternal workings]; They should be concerned about their mandates to deliver dividends for democracy to their consumption and stop intruding into the internal affairs of the Nass civil service. “
Another member of the staff said: “Going forward, the management of the National Assembly should eliminate very rigid penalties for those who try to reverse their rest/publication and not follow the right service process.
“No staff member should approach any legislator for any form of publication in the future. The civil service is respected for its discipline and the consideration of the merit in the movement and promotion, therefore these processes tested over time should be respected and supported.
“Nobody is essential in the civil service; there are a thousand and a competent staff who can and will always take on offices of responsibility. Therefore, the belief that no one is indispensable should be discouraged.
“A decision of the head of a department to distribute or redistribute the staff members who believe are not competent to remain in the positions they occupy should be respected. Knows staff members better than legislators and where their ability could be better exploited for the effectiveness of the service.”