People react as Simon Ekpa denied Ipob in court, saying ‘I am only a content creator’

Prime Minister of the Government of the Republic of Biafra in exile (BGIE), Simon Ekpa finally stated that he was not a member of the Biafra Indigenous Peoples (IPOB).

Ekpa, who made a rejection when he was arranged in the Finnish court on charges related to terror on Wednesday, denied the claim that he was a member of IPOB and described himself as the creator of content that made videos and other content for leisure time.

While giving his testimony during a cross examination, the founder of Ipob-Auto-Pilot, a group that separates from the main IPOB, told the court that he had nothing to do with the Pro-BIFRA group led by Nnamdi Kanu.

However, the rejection of EKPA for his membership over IPOB, causing rumors on social media because many X users have been taken to the platform to mock him for denying the group on the critical opportunity that he should have used to project the group image.

X user with a @chinex grip, writing:

“Just finished listening to the court process Simon Ekpa, and to be honest I did not believe. During a cross examination, he really kept away from Ipob, claiming he was only the creator of content. According to him, everything he did was ‘acting’, nothing more.”

Also read: Simon Ekpa Appears in the Finnish Court on Terrorism Allegations

@Jj Omojuwa also contributed:
“I understand Ipob Prime Minister Simon Ekpa told the Finnish Court who demanded that he was not a member of IPOB. That he was” Creator of Content “.

“Does Plime Mister denies the republic? He has been finished and the case has never begun. Talking, he is also a content creator. They changed their views into cash.”

@Eng. C Peters say:
“Neighbors Simon Ekpa testified against him, claiming he often heard him say” Woto Woto Promax “during the phone call. Out of curiosity, he did some excavations and found it allegedly a code phrase used by Simon every time he gave orders to his children in Alaigbo to leave and kill.”

@Ndubress also wrote:
“Guyman thinks he will stretch out of this. Before Oyibo brought the case, it is best to trust them not to cook well. Even if he managed to get out, the business of making the content was carried out and cleaned,” “

@Chαrliε bεαto md, other X users wrote:
“When the crowd cheered, people claim leadership. When the court shows, everyone changes” only observers. “Humans like credit without consequences.”

@Neto1 says:
“Simon Ekpa was given once a lifetime of life to attend and maintain the ideology of Biafran which he claimed to believe, right in the Finnish court. Conversely, he chose a cowardly by informing the court that he was only the creator of social media content. He almost denied being Simon Ekpa.

“However, some of his followers continue to repeat the same narrative about what is called” the creator of content. “These people do not represent IGBO people.

@Jay_den111 says this:
“Simon Ekpa has preached and deceived his followers that freedom would come tomorrow, saying that no true freedom fighters escaped prison or death. But at his court hearing, he claimed only a content creator, and here me, wondering why he did not boldly admit that he struggled for Biafra.”

@Hussling Benjamin wrote:
“His followers who were easily deceived did not have common sense. The golden opportunity was handed over to him on a gold plate to submit his argument to the Finnish government and why his ass# licked Mumu and followers who were easily fooled needed freedom, but men chose to use the creator of content as a escape route.”