The Court interrupts the market project of the APO resetting system in Abuja

A high Court of the Federal territory Capital (FCT) prevented the work from continuing to the APO resetting market system.

The market project is located on the plot 1729 Cadastral Zone E27, APO, Abuja.

The CEO of Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd. Dr. Shuaibu Omeiza Musari, on Monday visited the project website to glue the order of the court and also inform the workers on the site to stop the works as ordered by the high court FCT.

The judge Yusuf Halilu, in a sentence on the marked case: CV/467/2024, ordered the Amac Investment and Property Development Company Limited, Commercial Properties Ltd, Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd, and their agents to stop any works awaiting the determination of a cause that was offered against Dr. ShuaiBu Omeza Musari Companies, technologies and relationships for the company.

In an interlocutory order delivered on April 15, 2025, the judge Halilu deduced “the applicants/defendants to the reconventional/interviewed request, whether they are agents, delegates, servants, employees or in any case described, from the start, begin or continue to be in the field of construction in the matter of subject of ownership, in the matter of matter for the plot, being the plot of the plot, the plot of the plot. recurrent and conventional application submitted by the 2 defendant.

“Funding and the only marketer, and in line with the terms, the accused 2 ™ has provided a consideration of consequence by providing the capital/fund required for the operations and development of the project with a sum of N15,000,000.00 (fifteen million Naira), which the 3^RD The applicant duly recognized the reception of.

“The 2^nd Meter of the defendant/applicant due to the joint venture agreement that the parties have carried out these funds with a high interest rate to set in motion the project as a co-controller, financier and the only marketer that prompted the project to attend considerable and substantial progress after the release of these funds.

“Against the terms of the Joint Venture agreement duly entered into by the parties, the 3” recurrent/attributed to the reconventional/interviewee request, after taking advantage of the funds provided for by the accused 2 ™/counterattack of the applicant, who disgusted the 2 the project begins

“Having injected enormous funds in the project and has become commercially practicable, the applicant/defendant of 1% of the principal/respondent, became despotic, unintendedly patient on the 2nd^nd Agreed/ Contrato/ applicant outside the project and started the construction works without carrying the 2%defendant, just to become the only marketer, never after using funds of the 2^nd Controlling/applicant accused to start the project.

“The parties of a contract are legally required to comply with and respect the terms and conditions of the contract that have voluntarily made as expressed in the maximum in” PactasUnSsertvenda “which means” agreements must be preserved “, since otherwise it will involve the violation of the contract to which the law frowns.

“There is no place in our laws and in fact, in a decent society, in which a party would be authorized to defeat, extravagant and capriciously disconnected or vary the provisions of a contract validly stipulated by two or more parties,” said Judge Halilu.