JamzNG Latest News, Gist, Entertainment in Nigeria
It’s an absolute fact. Nigeria is on the cusp of a mineral-led economic revival. Beneath its soil lies a vast deposit of more than 44 commercially viable minerals ranging from gold, lithium and zinc to limestone and coal, with a combined value of more than $700 billion.
At a time when the global economy is shifting towards energy transition minerals, Nigeria’s solid minerals sector offers a strategic path to diversify away from oil dependence, expand revenue streams and generate mass employment.
Yet despite this immense promise, the sector remains grossly underperforming, contributing less than 2% of the nation’s gross domestic product as of early 2025. Even more concerning, the mining landscape has increasingly evolved into a theater of insecurity, criminal enterprises, and socioeconomic disruption, particularly in mineral-rich regions.
In states such as Zamfara, Katsina, Niger, Nasarawa, Kebbi, Adamawa, Plateau and parts of the Federal Capital Territory, illegal mining has established itself as a parallel economy, often controlled by armed groups, including bandits and crime syndicates.
These actors exploit weak regulatory enforcement, porous licensing systems, and local vulnerabilities to extract resources with impunity. The result is a dangerous convergence of economic sabotage, environmental degradation and violent conflict.
Numerous reports and field observations suggest that these illicit operations are not isolated activities but are embedded in broader networks involving complicit elites, foreign collaborators, and informal financiers. This complex network continues to deprive Nigeria of legitimate revenues, exacerbating insecurity and undermining governance structures at both the local and national levels.
To its credit, the federal government has initiated a series of reforms aimed at repositioning the mining sector. Under the leadership of the Minister of Solid Minerals, Dele Alake, several policy and operational measures have been introduced to sanitize the industry. In particular, the creation of 388 mineral purchasing centers in 2024 is designed to formalize mining transactions, improve traceability and curb illicit trade.
In parallel, the deployment of the Mining Marshals – a specialized unit from the Nigerian Security and Civil Defense Corps (NSCDC) – marked a significant escalation in law enforcement efforts. This paramilitary group is tasked with identifying illegal mining sites, arresting violators and facilitating prosecutions. By the end of 2025, the unit had reportedly sealed over 640 illegal mining sites and arrested more than 350 suspects, with over 150 already on trial.
While these interventions signal political will, they also highlight the scale of the challenge. Enforcement alone, while necessary, is not sufficient without a robust regulatory architecture that ensures transparency, accountability and inclusiveness throughout the mining value chain.
This is where the role of the Nigeria Minerals Cadastral Office becomes critical. As the statutory body responsible for the administration and management of mineral titles, the NMCO has made significant strides in digitizing licensing processes, improving cadastral mapping and strengthening investor confidence. Its electronic mining cadastre system (eMC+) has introduced greater efficiency and reduced bureaucratic bottlenecks in issuing and renewing mining licences.
However, the effectiveness of the NMCO – and indeed the broader regulatory framework – depends on interagency coordination, real-time data sharing and rigorous compliance monitoring. Licensing must go beyond issuing; must involve ongoing oversight to ensure operators comply with environmental standards, community engagement protocols and fiscal obligations.
Despite ongoing reforms, Nigeria’s mining sector continues to face significant structural challenges, including weak law enforcement in remote areas, corruption that undermines regulation, and poor interagency coordination. Inadequate data systems limit effective monitoring, while many artisanal miners operate outside legal frameworks due to poverty and bureaucratic barriers. Furthermore, environmental degradation and community displacement remain critical concerns.
Regulation as a safety imperative
The link between illegal mining and insecurity in Nigeria is increasingly evident. Unregulated mining sites have become safe havens for bandits and criminal groups, providing both funding and operational cover. By enforcing stringent licensing, monitoring supply chains, and implementing coordinated security responses, the government can dismantle these illicit networks.
Formalizing the sector reduces the economic incentives that drive young people into illegal mining and associated crime. It also improves intelligence gathering, as registered operators and communities become partners in surveillance and reporting. In this sense, regulation functions not only as an economic tool but as a critical component of national security strategy.
Proper regulation of mining is not only a governance necessity, but a strategic tool for economic growth, providing benefits to all levels of government and host communities.
At the federal level, it increases revenue through royalties, taxes and licensing fees, while reducing losses and improving tax planning. For states, although constitutionally bound to direct ownership of mineral resources, this creates opportunities to increase internally generated revenues, attract investment and reduce security costs related to illegal mining. At the local level, regulated mining drives rural development, stimulating small-scale business and economies around mining clusters, including transportation, housing and retail services.
More importantly, host communities, often the most affected but also the least benefited, can experience tangible improvements when regulation is enforced. They can benefit from improved livelihoods, employment opportunities and social infrastructure such as schools and healthcare. Effective regulation also helps prevent environmental damage, land disputes and public health risks.
A comprehensive regulatory review should prioritize the use of technologies such as satellite monitoring and geospatial tools to track mining activities and detect illegal operations in real time. It should also strengthen the legal framework by imposing tougher sanctions on illegal miners and their sponsors, including asset confiscation and cross-border enforcement measures. Furthermore, empowering host communities through benefit-sharing agreements, local employment opportunities and environmental protection will encourage them to resist and report illegal activities.
Equally important is the formalization of artisanal and small-scale miners by providing legal access, training and financial support to integrate them into the formal economy and reduce illegal practices. Furthermore, stronger collaboration with international partners is essential to track and curb illicit exports of minerals, particularly high-demand resources such as lithium and gold.
Ultimately, the stakes are high. Nigeria’s mining sector can remain a fragmented, conflict-prone space exploited by criminal networks or evolve into a well-regulated engine of national development. The difference lies in the rigor of its regulatory institutions, the consistency of enforcement and the inclusiveness of its policies.
The urgency of the reform is not merely economic, it is existential. A nation that fails to control its natural resources risks losing not only revenue, but sovereignty, stability, and the trust of its people.
