While the Court condemns Natasha, validates the power of the Senate of SU …

From the suspension of the senator who represents the central senatorial district of Kogi, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Auduaghan, by Senator Godswill Akpabio, the tenth Senate of March 6, 2025, for a serious conduct, for the caveness, there has been a cacophony of voices on his own own, constitution and legality of the action. Natasha alone was globtrott, preaching the Gospel of innocence and supporting the victimization and sexual harassment.
Transfer: Arsenal set to sign the Gykers as Man United moves for Calvert-Lewin
Senator Natasha made a infamous apparition at the Interparlamentary Union (IPU) women’s assembly held at the United Nations headquarters in New York, by torching the history of his suspension. He told women that his suspension was “political victimization, punishment for talking against gender -based violence” and after his accusations of sexual harassment against the President of the Senate, which is a lie from the Fossa of Hell. The accusations of sexual harassment were only a rethinking and, of course, another plot to discredit the person of the President of the Senate. He never learned that both the media and the public knew his history and could not bear anyone. The suspended and now condemned senator has never understood that the senate procedures are public documents and the women of the IPI could access it to confirm his accusations. He never occurred in Natasha who was dancing naked on the market in the inter-parliamentary union. Surprisingly, to date, the mercantito legislator has not filed any case or has started any criminal complaint that has touched its very propagated requests for sexual harassment.
Neither sex by brand nor adultery, not even cultural, but established to harass married women. [+Audio]Sex per degree: teacher captured naked with nursing mother married in her bedroom
Supported by the influencers of social media and freelance lawyers, Senator Natasha approached the Federal Court in Abuja, challenging the powers of the President of the Senate to preside over the procedures of the Senate after raising the whims encouraged by his dependence on order 10 of the permanent order of the Senate. It was on the basis of the same order 10 that insisted that he could speak from anywhere for violation of the rules. But last week, a high federal court chaired by judge Binta Nyako, finally resolved the matter and left Natasha in the cold.

On the main question raised in the substantial case, the court resolved all the questions for determining the suspended senator. Judge Binta Nyako has established with emphasis that the Nigerian Senate has the constitutional authority to regulate its members for violating his permanent orders. He stated that the action of the President of the Senate on February 20, 2025, in the realocation of the Senator Natasha seat, was legitimate and within his administrative powers pursuant to section 6 (2) of the rules when he tried to speak from a non -allocated seat. The court also stated that in the exercise of this power, the president of the Senate did not need to consult anyone. A senator is authorized to face the plenary with a formally assigned seat and Natasha acted in contrast with section 6 (2) of the rules when he tried to speak from a non -allocated place. His subsequent statement that the newly assigned seat did not allow its visibility of the media was as childish as it is irrelevant.

The Court, unequivocally filed that the referral of Senator Natasha by the Plenary Senate at the Senate Ethics Committee, the privileges and public petitions for disciplinary action was valid and appropriate, deriving from its violation of the orders of stay of the Senate.

The Court also confirmed the application presented by the President of the Senate Akpabio on the border with contempt. The Court discovered that the satirical “apologies” published on his official Facebook page on April 27, 2025 were a clear violation of his restrictive order issued on April 4, 2025, which prohibited all parties to make public comments on the matter.

Judge Nyako established that the publication was contemptuous, deliberately ridiculating both the president of the Senate and the judicial trial. Consequently, the Court imposed a 5 million dollar fine in the Federal Government of Nigeria and ordered Senator Natasha to publish public excuses within seven days in two national newspapers and on the same Facebook page in which the contemptuous publication was carried out.

This sentence speaks of volumes of the integrity deficit of the suspended senator, since his conduct has been up to what is expected of a senator of the Federal Republic. This questioned his psychological acuity and the ability to operate in a healthy and lawful environment. In other words, the court ruling has exposed the inability of the senator condemned to conform to constituting authority or respecting simple rules and regulations. She was transferred by a place and refused to respect the directive of the President of the Senate, who knew very well, had the power to preside over the Senate.

Once again, Natasha has been referred to the Senate Ethics Committee, the privileges and public petitions for unruly behavior. He ignored the invitation to appear before the Committee and defend himself, but rather he chose to go to the social media court to present his case. But when he was sanctioned and suspended, he ran to court for recovering. Still being recalcitrant, he could not obey the simple directives of the court to cease further comments on the matter until he was determined. Natasha went to the city by behaving like a secondary school girl who had just been delivered a new phone and proceeded to publish contemptuous material.

It is a pity that even being a lawyer and a legislator at the highest levels, Senator Natasha has exuded an incredible ignorance or weak understanding of the Nigerian Constitution, the principle of separation of the powers and the permanent orders and the rules of the Senate. Perhaps with this declaration by the Court, it will take time to reflect on the provisions of sections 4, 5, 6, 60 and 101 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), as well as section 6 (2) of the permanent orders and the rules of the Senate.

Parliament is a sacred environment for mature minds and not a zoo or a playground for the development of “content” according to Yuval Noah Harari, a historian, a philosopher and author of the bestsellers’ books “,” If you Atwipiens: a brief story of Humankind “,” Homo Deus: a short story of tomorrow “and” 21 lessons for the 21st century “in the Wembley Stadium or in the house of Parliament, You will get the chaos.

■ Ken Harries Esq is an Abuja -based development communication strategist.

Related