ACF to review Tinubu’s policy, warns that the north will not support leaders who damage regional interests

The Arwa Consultative Forum (ACF) has announced plans to form a special committee to evaluate the impact of policies, programs and projects of the Tinubu Bola President in North Nigeria, ahead of 2027 general elections.

Speaking at a forum meeting in Kaduna on Wednesday, Alhaji Bashir Dalhatu, Chair of the ACF Supervisory Board, said the committee would conduct a comprehensive review of current governance, especially in connection with its impact in the north. The aim, he said, was to ensure that the regional needs were not ruled out on the country’s political agenda and development.

“We have received several proposals from our elders to appoint a special committee who will conduct detailed studies on policies, projects and programs starting by the current government, and determine how they have an impact on various parts of the state – especially North Nigeria,” said Dalhatu.

He stressed that political loyalty in the region will be guided by the performance and protection of regional interests rather than blind loyalty to individuals or political parties.

Also read: Reps Order Oil Company To Sent $ 4 Million to Federation Account

“To avoid doubts, we must reaffirm our belief in the principle that all politics is local,” he said. “Northern Nigeria will remain loyal not to a particular politician or party, but for those who care about our regional interests and are willing to promote and protect them.”

Dalhatu criticized the national fixation that developed in the 2027 election, describing it as “premature” and disturbance of the responsibilities of elected officials.

“The current preoccupation with the 2027 National Election is to harm the principle of four -year term given to elected leaders,” he said. “For now, the important thing is that North Nigeria watched and audited their ruling performance, especially at the federal level.”

Re -emphasizing trust in the power of the region, Dalhatu noted that the North was well positioned to play a major role in the future of Nigeria, boasting a significant representation in the national governance structure.

“The North has 19 out of 36 states, the territory of the Federal Capital, the majority in the two chamber of the National Assembly, and the attendance that governs in the National Economic Council and the State Council,” he said. “We occupy nearly 75 percent of the area of ​​Nigerian land and is a home for about 60 percent of the population.”

However, he voiced a deep concern over what ACF was described as an increase in hostility and targeted violence against north people who lived or do business in the south, especially in the southeast. Dalhatu said this trend damaged the unity of the Nigerian federation.

“While the north historically welcomes people from all regions with unlimited hospitality, the same thing cannot be said about our experience in the south,” he said. “In many southeastern parts, a northern person cannot expect to get one square foot, let alone a significant property.”

He described the ongoing attack on the northern people – especially travelers and residents – as a long -standing problem that failed to be resolved by the government.

“The open door policy in the north has met with greater hostility. This imbalance is very painful and regrettable, and reflects dangerous fractures in our federation,” Dalhatu said.

He went further to connect regional tension with federal policies which he described as discriminatory, saying they have exiled many people in the north and caused an increase in disappointment.

“There is a bigger frustration. Some begin to question the essence of the unity itself,” he warned.

Dalhatu also raised an urgent concern about the worsening of insecurity in the north, land grabbing, and marginalization of the Abuja indigenous peoples. He called for land reforms that were urgent to prevent the north of the people from “not having land in their own territory” because of alleged foreign land acquisition.

On the fate of the native of Abuja, he demanded compensation and recognition.

“The native people of Abuja have been expelled from their ancestral land and become homeless. This injustice must be handled. We call on the federal government to fulfill their obligations, including the creation of the state for indigenous peoples in the Nigerian Federation,” he said.

Join the conversation

Opinion

Supports Nigeria’s ripples, resistant Journalism Solutions

A balanced and fearful journalism that is driven by data comes with enormous financial costs.

As a media platform, we ask for leadership accountability and will not trade the right to suppress freedom and freedom of speech for a piece of cake.

If you like what we do, and ready to uphold journalism solutions, friendly Nigerian ripples cause.

Your support will help ensure that residents and institutions continue to have free access to credible and reliable information for community development.

Donation now

Check Also

Freedom of Information Act and The Limits of Press Freedom, By Mack Ogbamosa – THISAGE

        Introduction  A free, independent, and vibrant press is one of the strongest pillars of any democratic society. It is against this background that most democratic countries  make constitutional provisions for a free press . Others even go further to enact specific laws to make affairs of governments freely available to the public. Currently, there are more than  130 countries in the world that have free press laws. They include Sweden, United States, France, South Africa and Nigeria. Nigeria did not only make  constitutional provisions in Sections 22 and 39(1) of the 1999 Constitution ( as amended) but also went ahead to enact the Freedom of Information Act  in 2011. Section 22 of the 1999  Constitution states: “ “The press, radio, television and other agencies of the mass media  shall at all times be free to uphold the fundamental objectives contained in this chapter( ie Chapter II) and uphold the responsibility and accountability of the Government to the people”  Section 39(1)  of same Constitution states : “Every person shall be entitled to freedom of expression, including freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference” ..  To complement these constitutional provisions, Section 1 (1) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) states “Notwithstanding anything contained in any other Act, law or regulation, the right of any person to access or request information, whether or not contained in any written form, which is in the custody or possession of any public official, agency or institution howsoever described, is established.” while Section  2(2), states that: “A public institution shall ensure the proper organization and maintenance of all information in its custody in a manner that facilitates public access to such information”  Primary Purpose of FOIA  According to the Act, its primary purpose is to make information about public records freely available to every Nigerian in the public interest. …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *